Quote:
Originally Posted by lazjen
PCC failed to work for this image too, but I think I might have another idea to retry it next time around.
One of the hassles with all this processing is how long it takes. Even with my decent machine here, it takes hours to get to the point for the 4 channels of drizzle integration (this started with over 200 images per channel). Then I do all the processing on these larger drizzle images, and only resize when publishing, so each operation takes just that little bit longer. That's one of the reasons why I'm taking a break before having another go at this image for a reprocess. At least when I do, I can start at the drizzle images and go from there.  |
Ah, right, I forgot you were having issues with PCC. Yeah, that makes things hard.
It's been a long time since I've used drizzle, but I recall with PI you can use drizzle without increasing the image size. I would hope that would help with the negative effects of being undersampled (e.g. square stars) while keeping the integrated data and thus speeding up post processing
