View Single Post
  #7  
Old 10-06-2020, 02:25 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Thanks for all the responses. The 290 seems the go then.

I am currently using an SBIG STi guider which has a mechanical shutter which is handy for doing autodark subtracts. I don't use PHD2 but have in the past.
I don't think the Sky X will allow me to use a dark from a library.

Is the 290 pretty clean without it? I am not worried about a few hot pixels, I am more concerned with white bars, interference patterns that can be confused with the guide star like I had with an SX Lodestar.

I get guide stars resonably easily in most situations but there is the odd one where its hard. M104 comes to mind as an example of no nearby guidestars. 80% QE would help there.

Greg.
Greg I have never had interference patterns with the 290, and zero hot pixels that I could find.
Reply With Quote