View Single Post
  #8  
Old 24-03-2020, 12:35 PM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimrichards View Post
Thanks to everyone for all the input.

I am leaning towards the ASI290MM for the following reasons.

- I am not worried about the extra processing time.
- Generally accepted that mono is better.
- I can add a fourth filter.
- Fastest frame rate
- Binning 2x would keep me just below 1/2 the Dawes limit

I am still a bit concerned about the "now needed" de-rotation being detrimental but presume that has been accounted for in "Generally accepted that mono is better."
Thanks again
Kim
Hi Kim,

No need to Bin or worry about the Dawes limit with planetary.

Below are my settings when I imaged Mercury last week. As you can see I am imaging at double the dawes limit for a 12" scope. Results attached.

FireCapture v2.6 Settings
------------------------------------
Camera=ZWO ASI290MM
Filter=IR685
Profile=Mercury
Resolution=0.25"
Filename=2020-03-15-2006_2-IR685-Mercury.ser
Date=150320
Start=200519.690
Mid=200616.492
End=200713.295
Start(UT)=200519.690
Mid(UT)=200616.492
End(UT)=200713.295
Duration=113.605s
Date_format=ddMMyy
Time_format=HHmmss
LT=UT +10h
Frames captured=16427
File type=SER
Binning=no
ROI=584x534
ROI(Offset)=624x328
FPS (avg.)=144
Shutter=6.916ms
Gain=359 (59%)
AutoGain=off
Brightness=1
AutoHisto=75 (off)
HighSpeed=on
USBTraffic=85
SoftwareGain=10 (off)
Gamma=0 (off)
AutoExposure=off
FPS=100 (off)
Histogramm(min)=1
Histogramm(max)=248
Histogramm=97%
Noise(avg.deviation)=5.90
Limit=none
Sensor temperature=18.7°C
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Web Image Mercury.jpg)
67.5 KB105 views
Reply With Quote