Thank you all for your comments!
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey
Wait... the luminance data for this was 2.6" - 4.6"? For real? That's a sensational processing effort given that starting point.
|
Hi Lee, yes the final average FWHM of the stack was 3.35", so not really ideal. I managed to reduce it to 2.35" thru deconvolution, however still not ideal to get as many details as I wanted. As I posted before, I suspect I need to upgrade the focusing system in order to improve it and also to work a bit more on the orthogonality of the CCD plane. Unfortunately between smoke and dust followed by adverse weather conditions I could not do any imaging on the last 10 days so I hope to have some chances next days. To add a focuser on the imaging train unfortunately is going to take longer..
Clear skies
Marco