View Single Post
  #9  
Old 06-09-2019, 06:29 PM
Jimbus (Jim)
Registered User

Jimbus is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
I agree, when I did the math it came out to 2.02° . (A different method to what you used)

P.S. You should edit the title to show SMC size confusion.
Thanks Billdan
Yes it has been changed to SMC in the title. I confused it in the title.
Rough estimate the diameter should be 20000 light years for that angular size. How can they have it so wrong?
further.
Cheers
Jim

Last edited by Jimbus; 06-09-2019 at 06:32 PM. Reason: Spelling
Reply With Quote