Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
I would like to ask a question but I bet it would not be addressed....☺
Is the big bang theory credible given it relies upon the unsupported theory (is it even a theory) of inflation that requires the universe to come into existence and grow to certainly the size of the observable universe and given the observed flatness to a much much greater size than even that... in an instant..all we can see in an instant growing from the size of an atom to the size of the observable universe in an instant..think of what that requires one to accept as possible and indeed the underlying fact upon which our cosmology rides..well not an instant but in a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second not instant but so close to instant why not just say in an instant.
Without inflation the theory fails so surely this aspect of the story must require much more to establish that the theory in anyway reflects reality.
Honestly can one not conclude that such is unlikly if not down right impossible...sounds like science is simply accomodating preconceived notions of creation.
Alex
|
The Universe did not grow to it's present size in an instant.
It grew from smaller than a proton to the size
of a grapefruit in an instant.