|
Mind you looking thru New Scientist headliners one can find legitimate stuff that although put forward by a scientist leaves me thinking much the same as the no big bang proposal. I personally still keep two models in mind..big bang and steady state. I dont like big bang because I suspect it as a parrallel to the biblical story..the difference being 6 days for the God method and 13.5 billion years for the big bang method..I think both suggest forces beyond our grasp.. I like to think that there is no reason why one really needs a start or an end to the Universe other than to satisfy religious concerns. But if there be a God I doubt if he would be limited by time he is God after all, would any one dare suggest that for God it could be otherwise.
alex
|