View Single Post
  #5  
Old 07-05-2019, 10:15 AM
Ryderscope's Avatar
Ryderscope (Rodney)
Registered User

Ryderscope is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glanmire, NSW
Posts: 2,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Ah yes, of course...I even suggested using Simbad

Mike
Exactly, and thanks for the suggestion as well. And for the benefit of others who may be wondering what we are talking (posting?) about, I shall explain.

There was one (of the many) background galaxies that caught my eye and I decided that I would hunt down the catalogue number for it. It sort of looked like a galaxy but I thought that it could have been a PN as well. See attached images for the location of the object. Having checked my usual resources (Sky Safari Pro, Stellarium etc.) I couldn't find it so following Mike's suggestion I ventured into SIMBAD.

SIMBAD, being a science based resource, does not have an overly intuitive interface so takes a little bit of nutting out to drive it. A good thing to do on a rainy day at a star party . There are a number of search criteria that one can use to search for an object and the one that I finished up using was a location based search where you provide the coordinates and a search radius.

Using the approximate location of the object (taken from Stellarium) and a search radius of 5 arc minutes, SIMBAD presented a list of four objects which included one galaxy. Clicking on the link for the galaxy entry provided additional details and an image of the very object I was looking for - Voila!. We were very pleased with ourselves.

The galaxy itself does not seem to have a catalogue number apart from the reference to the 6dFGS sky survey and a position number. If you want to take a look at the output from the search query on SIMBAD, click here.

Thanks again Mike for your suggestion, it was a good fun little project and a good thing to do on a rainy day at a star party
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Location 01.jpg)
200.5 KB19 views
Click for full-size image (Location 02.JPG)
167.5 KB20 views
Reply With Quote