Quote:
|
I suspect a flaw in your logic
|
I do TOO!
Quote:
|
As the ray paths don’t vary in length after being reflected by a flat surface ... still converge at the same distance from either the primary mirror or final refractive surface of a lens and should still conform to the original concave or convex image originally produced.
|
they do, do they? I still don't get that. Maybe in another 50 years. Until then, I'll re-add that question to the collection of "Things I don't understand".
Nick, your post amounts to attempted bullying. Very bad. But you seem to enjoy it once a fortnight or so, trying to bully forum members, don't you. Like a hobby? Well. I enjoy trying to understand things I don't understand. It's a less mean pastime. In the future, you could do us all a favor and ignore my posts. As I will do with yours.
Jeremy, I don't own a really good diagonal nor eyepiece. I don't know any person who does, either. So your assumption might be correct. But I can't confirm it.
"tl;dr" at the beginning of my post stands for "too long, didn't read" - an acronym used on the internet to summarize a following, much longer version.
I know my posts are often too long. Especially with stuff I don't understand. I need to learn boiling down my thoughts better. Until I can do that properly, I add a "tl;dr" short version to lessen the negative impact on others.