Oh dear i knew i should not have used that example. What i ment was that Scientist should not stick to what we know as an absolute. Everything changes. And the Creationist who follow it more as a faith rather than a science should also realise that you can also never prove it. That is faith it does not require proof. I to am often conflicted my own inate desire to prove it, but in cool reflection i realise that is not what is meant to be. It is by design/evolution that we do not know everything. If we did than we would neither evolve nor need faith.
It is an inner conflict for all who belive in something passionetly, that they wish others to also see. But it can not be forced.
Regards
|