Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
Hmmm, not sure what screens others are using but on my 4K screen there is speckle artefacts every where and in particular around the stars. In short it looks way over sharpened. I think your previous version was right personally.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
Hi Peter,
great result,
can you please post a picture of what it looked like before this new processing technique?
It would be nice to see the before and after results.
cheers
Allan
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by petershah
lovely image....I couldn't think of anything better to do on a rainy evening
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosborn
Like! 
Kevin |
Quote:
Originally Posted by phomer
Wow!
Paul
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
As Deadpool would say "maximum effort!". That's a truck load of layers.  The end result looks good though. |
Thanks guys. I do agree with you Paul, it's a sharpening process that is pretty heavy handed (eg causes speckle) and does not like thin data. I suspect it could be used with a mask or two with good effect, but I'm still working on how to modify and best apply the technique (if at all...sharpness is intrinsic to the data and not something you can add later IMHO)