Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir
It's all interesting, but in reality, I think an amateur astronomer would be much better off with FLI16200 for less than half the price of what QHY asks for their QHY42. It looks like unless it is a mass produced sensor, a specialised CMOS is at least as expensive as CCD.
|
I know QHY are up and coming but I wonder how good their quality is over time with use. FLI is proven.
Yes I agree the cost/benefit ratio is not good enough at this stage to upgrade.
sCMOS would probably only mean a lot of underexposed images that are not as deep as we all want to see.
Greg.