View Single Post
  #15  
Old 07-07-2018, 09:59 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
Lots of good advices.

I may just add that I really liked my TS ED 102mm f/7 Photoline telescope - it had a solid 3" focuser and a nice reducer. It came in a double cardboard box with some styrofoam cut-out pieces that well protected the cargo. I did upgrade the focuser though to a 2.5" Moonlite with a rotator. The only reason I sold it, and after long research bought 105mm CFF, was a bit imperfect colour correction of my TS doublet.

The quality of CFF is a few notches higher thany my previously owned TS - starting from impeccable second to none packaging, machined solid tube that won't flex, machined baffles, solid 3.2" FTF and beautiful optics including a substantial dedicated CFF corrector.

Having said that, from my experience with a TS doublet, I am confident that their triplets are also very good and capable for capturing great data. But I'm also glad I splashed a bit more on an instrument that was made with a great attention to detail.
The CFF sounds like the scope to have at the moment. They have a great range of sizes and options. They seem to be getting more popular.

Greg.
Reply With Quote