View Single Post
  #20  
Old 07-08-2006, 03:22 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmorbius
Now assuming what I've said is roughly true... one last question... If I were imaging and therefore the photon collection capability of the scope was not a major factor... would the image typically be better from a refractor? Is it a case of optics quality? In other words, if I wanted the same image quality from a reflector I would end up spending the same amount of money to get similar quality optics (mirrors)?
A smaller refractor will work BUT there is a formula for the resolution of a scope and its based on the aperture, the larger the aperture the finer resolution possible. This extends to better resolution in your final image from a larger aperture, whether its from a refractor or reflector, and this means a better image. Size matters!!

Another important factor is that a larger aperture will be gathering more light in a given time so your exposures will be shorter for a larger aperture. This will give you a better chance of grabbing more images in times of good seeing in a larger scope than a smaller scope allowing for a better image and to actually get to use the better resolution of the scope. Again, size matters

After saying that whatever scope you use most is the best.

Cheers
Reply With Quote