View Single Post
  #10  
Old 16-06-2018, 02:30 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Hope this helps..?

We have similar scopes, you are at 1000mm FL while I am at 1120mm, yours is 10" and mine is 12" so not much difference.

Here is the same PN taken with NB filters through my scope (5 years ago) using a Starlightxpress H694 CCD with 4.54 micron pixels, providing an image scale of 0.83"/pix

NGC 5129

Hardly any exposure as it was only a very quick first light test image for the new camera and off axis guider setup. It will be up to you if you think the difference is there ...personally I don't think there is that much

Mike
Thanks for that Mike. Good comparison. I thought there would be more difference. Gives me something to think about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by E_ri_k View Post
Very cool Kevin. I recal catching this one my self a while ago. A very interesting object, I was surprised. Good job

Erik
Thanks Erik!

Quote:
Originally Posted by topheart View Post
Hi Kevin,

A very nice spiral nebula. very well done!!


I am amazed that you can do so well with a DSLR....!!

Here is my version with an astro CCD setup for your comparison too. I think you are very similar, but my scope is quite different with a much longer focal length.....

https://savannahskies.smugmug.com/Nebula/i-QSg8wGf/A

Cheers,
Tim
Thanks for the comparison Tim. The longer focal length shows.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35 View Post
It's a great looking NGC 5189 with your current setup Kevin. What you see of course depends so much on the specific object. In general you're always going to do better with a CCD camera on these tiny objects though. I image a lot of them. Here's a random sample:

http://members.pcug.org.au/~stevec/Lo5_STL6303_RC.htm

Steve
Thanks Steve!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
Another great image Kevin - well done
Thanks Suavi!

Well that's helped, I think. I suspect this object is DSLR friendly though. And I know some are very very hard, like Abell 35.
Reply With Quote