What I'm saying: Noam's conclusion that keeping workers insecure is a tool to keep them quiet and to keep them away from creating chaos in the system of the rich -
can not be true. Or he would have used a better proof to support his claim.
The one chosen can not be called proof.
I'm no economist. But I do believe that controlling inflation is in the interest of the rich as well as of the poor.
Especially in our system in which not "caring sustainability" but "greed and growth" are touted as THE governing forces of human beings and their societies.
So Noam should not be taken as the herald of truth. I for one will be cautious. I don't want to be lured into hopeless cynicism for nothing