View Single Post
  #12  
Old 05-06-2018, 09:15 PM
AndyG's Avatar
AndyG (Andy)
No. I am a meat popsicle.

AndyG is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Townsville
Posts: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by sil View Post
However I suggest grabbing AutoStakkert instead of registax. Dump the files from PIPP into AutoStakkert and it'll do its own wavelet (I think) sharpening and levels adjusting. I suspect both Kevin and Andy will get much better results using the data they captured already. I absolutely hate wavelets in registax, they confuse the hell out of me, And I've done some testing in the past with registax, PixInsight and Autostakkert on planetary and found my best efforts in PixInsight were hard to pick from the automatic sharpening of AutoStakkert (and its only a checkbox to turn on, simple!). So I trust all my planetary, solar/lunar surface data to AutoStakkert now.

That's terrific advice Sil, thankyou for taking the time to share that. I'm lucky in planetary shots that my Nextar SE is not really a shortfall, compared to the long exposure times I could never get without an EQ mount. I can work with what I have and improve the "method" portion of the task, thanks to good advice.


Registax6 in all honesty was incredibly unstable on my PC. I didn't however see an opportunity for DSS to ingest video. I'm sure Autostakkert will help


Cheers, Andy.
Reply With Quote