Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
And clearly in the review Logan has exaggerated the cons to diswade tyre kickers from calling and wasting his time.
Clearly the mass of the scope is a major advantage for imaging as he no doubt realises when he examines the superb images aquired with this exceptional scope. ..there is nothing better than high mass to dampen vibration which is always present in lesser scopes.
And Logan presenting cost as a con shows clearly that he realises this scope is not for anyone who puts price first and quality and performance second.
|
You dont want extra weight in an imaging setup, its not a major advantage, its a disadvantage. Mounts cant handle more hefty scopes without throwing away subs, unless you have a very large mount.
As for the focuser, put on a moonlite, done, not much else to it, and dual speed focusers are a must for imaging as you simply cannot get the precision needed for
perfect focus with 1:1.
I dont understand why you were saying that Logan was dishonest in the review, misleading viewers, as he isnt trying to sell the scope to anyone?
Oh well, great review Logan, a regular Casey Neistat.