View Single Post
  #40  
Old 12-12-2017, 10:59 PM
Tropo-Bob (Bob)
Registered User

Tropo-Bob is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
I am talking about the photos.

Have you looked?

The point is near 100% of photos are perfect.
Superb framing, composition. exposure lighting.

Look you are in the presence of the worlds most sceptical man.

Do you think I am easily fooled?

Don't you think the things I raise I would dismiss faster than anyone else here?

But if you don't need to look before you reject my observation I understand but if you did look I would be surprised if any photographer would not think that it is studio material.

I am not for a moment suggesting they did not go but I certainly am inclined to think the shots could well have been generated in the studio...and really why not.
They had the stuff, sets simulation things so it is quiet possible.
And frankly doing studio shots makes sense from a PR view point.

Anyways I don't care I just thought given the photographers here it would be neat looking at the photos and considering if you could get near 100% perfect photos.

Framing the perfect shot each time every time does not happen... Who here has shot 100 that are perfect.

And I am sorry that I started this thread you all now think I am a hoaxer and that was never my point and I doubt if anyone has considered what I am saying...all that your head is saying is we went to the moon, we went to the moon...

Alex
I remember the live coverage from the Moon Landing. The lighting and contrast were terrible on our black & white TV.

A major talking point amongst my Astronomy mates after the landing (but before the famous first step) was the NASA voice over giving the number of seconds. It only recently that I understood that was the time left to burn fuel before they would have insufficient fuel to get back to the orbiter.
That would be a very clever touch if it was faked!

Nevertheless, it is good to hear what the skeptics saying and be able to rebut their points if they care to listen. However, from the way that they talk about the flag waving in the breeze, and ignoring the explanation of what was actually occurring, well, I don't think they want to know.

At least Alex, U are showing that U are better than most by showing that U are prepared to listen and consider points raised by those with an opposite point of view.
Reply With Quote