Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
Neither Fission (a long, long way off) .
|
Thought we had been doing this since 1940's ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
If the Green's hadn't destroyed the Nuclear industry in the 70's & 80's our Carbon drenched world would be far cleaner.
|
Gee... I thought 3 mile island, chernobyl and fukyoushima; a large number of leaks, lack of economic viability, subsidised fossil fuels and the mountain of toxic waste had something to do with it....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
The only advances we have enjoyed in Fusion Power has been in Warships the new Ford Class of Aircraft Carrier ....
|
I'll have one of those
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
The energy "debate" continues to be distorted and there is a distinct whiff of "Trump is Hitler" about the "debate".
|
...He's probably chanelling that psycho... at the very least!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
My gripe is that energy is the province of science, energy shouldn't be the province of ideology or distortions occur, nor should energy be a "safe space".
|
... and yet our ideologically driven government has done everything in its power to support fossil fuels whilst destroying the renewables industry in this country...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
Truth has been the first victim in the energy debate. Nuclear is in part an answer, a very good answer.
|
Gotta agree with you there. Ever heard of "Clean coal" Oxymoron if I ever heard of one
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
If the Green's hadn't destroyed the development of Civilian Fusion Power generation then today would have been a better cleaner and much cooler world.
|
Refer to previous
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary
Given that everyone who is an Icer' is interested in science, or even a citizen scientist it's beholden upon us to adhere to higher standards and dare I say, employ the scientific method when discussing power generation rather than attempting to do a preference deal.
|
Couldn't agree with you more. Try it...
