[Retrograde (Pete)]

Originally Posted by gregbradley

A lovely widefield. Nicely done.

That Samyang 135 2 is an interesting lens. It get a lot of good reviews.

I am looking to do some lens imaging again. I may look into that one. The classic is the Zeiss 135 APO but I am not sure if there is much of a difference.
Another I read is good is the Voigtlander 135 1.8. There is also a Sigma art 135 1.8. So many choices.

Greg.

Thanks Greg!

If money was no object then it would be hard to go past the Zeiss. I've seen some fantastic images with it but it was out of my price range.

Originally Posted by strongmanmike

Dang! I gotta get down that way more often next year, I always forget people are down there

Yes it was dewy huh?, but I guess clear is No 1, seeing is No 2, transparency is No 3 and dew is No 4 in order of wishes

Mike

Yes come and visit us next year.
Dew can be dealt with of course but not cloud. I'm certainly not complaining about the conditions we had this year

Originally Posted by Placidus

A very fine starscape, Pete.

As Marc said, all the favorites at once - your widefield image reminds us that the galaxy isn't really populated with discrete objects, but with a continuum of activity.

I particularly like the serpiginous back-to-front S-shaped river of bright blue stars that threads upward from the running chicken and eventually hooks around and embraces eta carinae.

Well done.
Mike

Thanks Mike.
Yes it's a very rich, inter-connected region - I didn't even realise that the Statue of Liberty Nebula (not having ever tried to image it) was also there right in the centre.

Originally Posted by Camelopardalis

Nicely done Pete lovely rich colours. That 135 looks a cracker, taming ultra fast f-ratios is ultra tricky with only a focus ring

Cheers Dunk. After SPSP I think I know what I'm doing with the focus now and all the shots I took on the second night came out really well.

Originally Posted by Atmos

Fantastic area Pete It can be nice seeing where some of the objects are in relation to one another.

As for the Samyang 135mm, from what I've heard it can suffer from balling effects and it isn't quite as sharp as the Zeiss 135... the Zeiss is more expensive, is sharper and doesn't suffer from halo effects that can plague the Samyang.

Read a review of the Sigma 135mm, it is the sharpest lens LensTip has ever tested but it does seem to suffer from a lot of sample variation, the couple that have been tested on CN not producing as fine results in the field as in house testing would suggest. Still cheaper than the Zeiss though.

Thanks Colin. Seems there are more and more choices for mid-focal-length lenses out there. I'd love a Zeiss Sonnar but couldn't justify the price for the limited amount of imaging I do (& it doesn't have a native Pentax K-mount option anyway). A Nikon D810A + Zeiss Sonnar would be my dream wide-field rig but I'm still happy with the results from my set-up so far.
Sigma look like they are making great progress with their lens options and Samyang also suffers from a lot of QC issues I believe