Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulus
Nice result Bob, and practice will bring perfection.
Keep it up. (The scope that is)
Trev
|
Thnx Trevor, (y) - - - - - Do I 'turn it On' before getting it up
-----------------------------------------------------------
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by blinky
The second attempt is a great improvement in detail. Well done! What do you think you did that gave you the largest improvements?
I've been playing a bit with stack sizes in fairly poor seeing. autostakkert's ability to do different sized stacks is a great help when doing this. Your result looks similar to when i've tried fiddling with the stack size.
|
Thnx Leigh, ,
Re: Largest Improvements - mainly post processing in PShop 'after the stacking' basically ! Not so much as how big the stack, tho am finding stacking around 30% of images is a ballpark average of what I'm finding pretty ok.
I'm also finding the 1.5x drizzle in Autostakkert giving me the best details when fiddling with the Waveletts in Registax.
But the most improvement has come from taking that processed 1.5x drizz image into PS3 and 'enlarging to approx 120dpi, then do what I can with 'selection' levels mainly,,,, & some 'selective' sharpening
Then back to 72dpi and a copy into a Jpg - take the jpg back into Registax and can normally 'slightly improve it again in Registax
Probably quite Unorthodoxed and probably not the best - but - all experimentation at this stage, as doing the basics from Tute Vids is only a guide to familiarize one with the basic functions of a programme, ie Registax etc; from then on, it is more or less, tweek tweek tweek, try this, try that - for me anyway
Hope this helps some