Quote:
Originally Posted by pgc hunter
The first article's heading "Some sites show cooling - but you can't draw global conclusions from individual sites".
That ofcourse does not apply to the warmists, every time somewhere records above temperatures, the global warming brigade go haywire - Brisbane had an above average January - BAM conclusive proof of global warming. What hypocrisy.
Second article: "A local cold day has nothing to do with the long-term trend of increasing global temperatures".
Yet, a local hot day has everything to do with increasing global temperatures, while the fact that places are experiencing below average temps for months on end, as has been the case in SE Australia in 2016/17, are conveniently ignored by the AGW mob. But, never mind, a month of hot summer weather in Brisbane is irrefutable evidence of global warming.  |
I thought you might respond that way and it seems pointless to argue with you since you will dismiss anything that doesn't fit your view.
Now, just in case you can understand things and perhaps are just ignorant at this point, I'll try one more time. Media reports are just that - reports - whether it's cooler in one place or warmer in another. Look behind the reports and find the scientific data and evidence that's collected over *time* that's more than short-term sensational paper-selling stories. If you bothered to do that, you'd see the "irrefutable evidence of global warming".