Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Again, I cant tell the diff. Who the hell would use a 32" "corrected" anything?. Mustve been crook to start with.
|
I agree both our scopes were lemons until they got corrected...like HST
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz
Hopefully the CHART32 guys say things along the lines of "if only we had 5x the aperture and no atmosphere..." That would be fair.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey
Good effort, Mike! Nothing like putting your own efforts side by side with pro stuff to make your--very good--results look average. At least your stars aren't green |
He he cheers Ray and Lee, yeah, it's fun to see what you are getting (or not getting) in comparison to great scopes at great locations...well I think it's fun anyway
. I don't care that it makes my image look soft and blurry
helps me see what features I have actually captured, that Hubbly scope is a reasonable reference too
Quote:
|
Nothing wrong with a little bit of decon applied well :p
|
Agreed...and I (and I would assume Chart32 too) used it here even
...but ya canni tell, can ya?...that's the secret
Mike