Lets not forget Trump won and we know if the rules were different he would not have won... but he won within the rules.
He beat the professionals at their own game no one likes that who has lost to a outside chance.
He presented as if he was actually listening to the concerns of people, without judgement upon them being too stupid to understand that it is efficient that their jobs go overseas.
He recogniced the concern many have for border security.
He worked to deal with frightened folks concern which although critics write off as deluded perceptions are nevertheless real for folk who hold the various fears and concerns Trump sort to address.
Clearly many liked that he seemed to understand.
They must have, as coming in as a rank outsider he beat both parties.. his first then the Dems.
I see no reason to hate the man for his "huge" achievement.
My concern is that his opposition firstly will not accept the game was played and he won but moreover their opposition is hate driven... sure this may be wrong or that may be wrong but can these issues not be dealt with without such hate.
It is a mistake to let emotion guide your views.
He won that should be the end of the story.
In four years time the game is played again and one can only wonder how an opposition who wont accept the outcome and the implications that such an outcome hints they were doing something very wrong to have lost, just how they can focus on winning the next game.
Has anyone in opposition asked how it came to pass that a political nobody beat both paries. Or are they just going to blame their loss upon the stupidy of the rules, the electorate or some foreign power hacking whatever.
I visit another site, supposedly a science site but you can post on politics and religion.. So many Trump threads it is tiresome and the inability to move on way past unfortunate.
But to those consumed with hate.... hate is a quality enjoyed by a loser that does no good whatsoever and rarely helps when dealing with problems.
Alex
|