View Single Post
  #11  
Old 20-01-2017, 07:56 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShOrEbReAk View Post
Pete and marc

Thanks for the replies. I think the generic focuser doesnt like the weight as suggested and is another reason why i asked abiut the low profile focuser.

I think the focuser was racked out to achieve focus on the moon by memory. I cant get anything in focus on live view except the moon when the camera is attached.

I will try the suggestion of taking everything of the camera and measuring as you said. Last and worst case scenario i will cut the tube down a little.

Would a better primary mirror be any help? Or is it just the size of the scope that is limiting my capabilities of getting some nice photos.

Cheers
Troy
If you're racked out then all you need is an extension tube, maybe 50mm and rack the focuser back in accordingly. Maybe try day time on the horizon to get an idea.
Your primary is likely to be more than adequate. I wouldn't worry about the optics. All you need to do is work out your focuser travel and how far from the tube your camera comes into focus. If you wish to upgrade to a better focuser in future and are worried about slippage then I'd recommend a moonlite. They're the best value for money, simple and beautifully engineered. For the aperture, your scope is a little slow but that's ok if you're guiding. I reckon you can get a lot out of it before you move on. 1000mm is a good FL. Plenty to do.
Reply With Quote