Hi there Nuri
Personally I find the concept that nothing can exsist as unacceptable
... if there was literally nothing...well we have nothing to build anything with.. something from nothing can not be..nothing from something can not be..
an expanding Universe into what medium does it expand.. nothing? It is something we think we know but find me some, as far as I can tell such a thing will not be found in our Universe or outside it (if there is an outside which there is not) With all this in mind it makes the big bang difficult to envisage for at that point we are asked to accept the unacceptable.. something from nothing... so far religion can only provide an answer.. but again I doubt if God would exsist in nothing. The fact that he was present says ..now that is really something
. So dont stop at nothing its inclussion avoids facing the reality of its non exsistence
.
The laws of physics are the laws of physics not the laws of the Universe the laws of physics merely purport to measure and quantify the observations of humans so in that context the recording and observation of time is a human invention (but a very useful one).
Any comment on the thrust of my proposition that time dialation is an observation produced as a result of the maximum speed limit? and thank you for your interest and input.
alex