Quote:
Originally Posted by clive milne
Ray, the guiding, processing, sharpening, colour balance and composition are near to perfection.
This, is in my humble opinion, getting close to a high water mark - in terms of extracting results from a given matrix of equipment/budget/local conditions, available exposure time, etc. (compression artefacts, not withstanding) Extra exposure will get you in Rolf's domain.
But anyway, pretty much nailed it.
My hope is that you would consider turning your sights on less frequently imaged territory.
Well done.
~c
|
thanks very much Clive. would be nice to get some more exposure, but there are too many other interesting things out there

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward
A delightful result.
Well done 
|
thanks very much Peter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Sharp detail and tastefully processed. An excellent 253, Ray 
|
thanks a lot Rick!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis
Fantastic Ray 
|
hi Dunk - thanks very much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT
Nice image Ray, that's a tasty little CCD.
Interesting faint stuff as well. 
|
thanks David. yep, the camera works like it should. agree, it is great to see the really deep space stuff coming out of the noise a little bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher
That's a beauty!
|
Thanks very much Kevin!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus
Brilliant! Pin sharp, beautiful colour and contrast.
|
thanks M&T. appreciated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos
Absolutely brilliant Ray! I have been waiting for you to post it
I never thought it was a galaxy cluster either, to me it looks like a starburst non-barred spiral galaxy. Learn something new 
|
thanks Colin. It must be a very compact cluster, but I guess that it is one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Yep, excellent! Not withstanding some nice wider field shots and several other great narrow field results.....overall, probably the best 253 posted on IIS to my eye  maybe even pipping Marcus Davies for the title  which is also a purler  ...although as far as actual details revealed, a careful blink comparison of the two shows a tight race
You demonstrate well that under Aussie skies remarkable results are possible with pretty modest gear, throwing the excuse of "but my gear isn't expensive" well and truly into the cop-out basket...if you understand the fundamentals and have a nack for processing of course  and a long focal length is not required, just appropriate image scale.
Mike
|
thanks very much Mike. well, I have always believed that seeing was the main limitation, provided that the scope is big enough. agree, focal length by itself is unimportant - seeing, aperture and image scale are the important parameters.
I used Marcus' beaut image as one of the benchmarks - if you think that I got anywhere near it that is great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies
A beautiful result Ray!  Top class resolution for sure!
Cheers, Marcus
|
Hi Marcus, thanks for that!
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Great image scale and details. Awesome shot. 
|
thanks you Marc - appreciated.
regards Ray