View Single Post
  #11  
Old 27-10-2016, 01:46 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Blimey, that took me 4 hours to do as much detail on my 6 YO DSLR.
Thanks Kevin. it seems that quite a bit of detail can be extracted from miniscule data - not the best way to use it, but an option if the weather gets in the way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Sure does demonstrate it That's a crazy good result for 9.5 minutes.

Greg.
thanks Greg. was looking at the subs and thought - I wonder... better than I thought it would be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
Wow, very powerful demonstration of how effective these cameras can be in capable hands
thanks Suavi. maybe not a practical way to use the camera, but at least an indication of what it does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
We're sold.
well, maybe. will need much bigger pixels for your system though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
That's amazing Ray,
what telescope did you use?

cheers
Allan
thanks Allan. This is with a Skywatcher 250f4 Newtonian.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
Very nice Ray!
Amazing for such a short time!
thanks Colin. this winter has favoured ultra short imaging sessions

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Very impressive, Ray. I'll jump on board as soon as we see large sensors with read noise that low

Cheers,
Rick.
thanks Rick. There are quite a few large CMOS sensors around that will outperform this one - none of them are mono though. we can hope.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
An interesting result, but I can't see any evidence of the many faint field galaxies in the background, or filigree structure within 253 itself..which I'm sure are within easy reach of your rig, but will no doubt take more than 10 minutes.

It would be nice if the lack of noise magically captured more flux
Thanks Peter. no, the fine detail isn't there, but I was surprised to find anything much at all. however, more detected photons would help.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SimmoW View Post
Nice demo for us lazy sods Ray!

Now do 3600 subs, report back results
don't blame me for your work ethic
a real version is in the pipeline.

regards Ray
Reply With Quote