[yoda776 (Matt)]

Thanks for the link and it does seem to be lacking more substantive academic evidence and on some pretty big assumptions. Time will tell as all theories are usually tested and either proved or disproved I guess.

Or may be they have been looking through the data too much and gone nuts

Originally Posted by Shiraz

got to give credit - it is ingenious. However, https://www.newscientist.com/article...r-human-error/