Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
O noes! I better go and delete all the substandard images I took with that noisy old KAF-16803 
More seriously, Matthew said he's able to do long subs so the option of a noisier but larger Kodak/Trusense sensor is still worthy of consideration if he's after a larger FOV. |
just think of all the free hard drive space you'd have
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
...low noise (the high noise remark is incorrect) its clean like a Sony sensor
|
Really? Maybe SBIG put the wrong values on their website then...
https://www.sbig.com/products/cameras/stxl/stxl-16200/
And QHY are quoting 10e!
"clean" like a Sony sensor...ICX674/694 family are generally ~4e (QSI quote better). Just presenting the facts according to the interweb...