Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Agreed about aperture but if you stick a barlow in there you'll still have a little more pixel to play with per second of arc. Easier to process and abuse with deconv IMHO. BTW you should jump on that old Q in the classified. You won't look back.
|
Yeah probably but 0.42"/pix (2X barlow) is getting pretty over sampled but not a bad idea to try...just can't be bothered reconfiguring everything...which I think I've banged on about before too
lazy...
Yes saw that N Q and while tempting I don't have the dosh just yet unfortunately and the latest Q is shorter and takes the 645 reducer which is the only one that will cover my 16803 chip.
Mike