|
The quetsion is really semantics about what is or not is a thing. After all if there is no information, no differentiation to something else, does it really exist or does it require something to be compared to. Similarly it is an argument of semantics as to wether the night sky is dark. It can only be compared to something else, such as the sky in the day. Information that does not represent anything known is egocentrically denied being in a state of existence but still must exist at the same time due to its denial. What is beyond our comprehension will be denied its existence but must exist by virtue of being beyond our comprehension. After all that is a differentiation itself. Anyway, simply put, the way I sense it is that where we perceive the threshold of existence must always progress because at that boundary is an ineffable difference which is existence itself. We may just need to accept laws of physics or scales of difference which are beyond those we are so far familiar with.
|