I enjoyed, once I was done shouting abuse at my television, looking up "all the bad physics in the movie Gravity" on the internets and chuckling heartily at all the cleverer-than-Hollywood commentators blogging up their lists of inaccuracies in the movie which neatly demonstrate what a fickle thing the human memory and perception system is (or how rarely bloggers check their facts). My personal highlight was "At the start of the film the Hubble is attached to the end of the robotic arm and the arm is extended straight up from the cargo bay: this could never work as the arm would bend when subjected to the differential loads of masses as large as Hubble and the Orbiter at different altitudes" - while the "myth is busted" I guess (they orbit at slightly different speeds), that actually doesn't happen in the movie. In scene 1 Hubble is attached to the Hubble dock in the cargo bay, and that person's brain invented them a movie-myth to be clever and bust, all on its own.
Sort of back on topic, though, there's a report somewhere that claims we're about 20 years away from a "space economy", ie a proportion of global commerce conducted purely within space: products/services provided from space to other parties in space, with no involvement of earthbound entities at all. Some startups are already identifying "tracking and/or neutralising space junk" as probably the first industry that will fit that description.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...tle_window.jpg
etc.