Quote:
Originally Posted by keepthebeercold
.....Isn't that like me sitting on my deck chair in Sydney and saying I can observe cars in Melbourne, because auntie Lizzy visited two weeks ago and parked hers in my garage and I have a theory that predicts this car now to be in Melbourne?
|
yes
What's important is that of all the Scientific disciplines in the Religion of Science the least complicated and intellectually rudimentary and simplistic is Physics.
Chemistry becomes more complicated, followed by Biology which is even more complicated again. On top of these we have psychology and economics which are so complicated that as predictive religious tools, they are unable to generate collective results.
Then we have the field of mathematics which is the simplest of all Art Philosophies - more of a mystical religious circus full of priests and freaks. Mathematicians admit by definition that their profession is the purest of religions and their proofs are baseless in reality.
No wonder the dynamite kid Nobel refused to include Mathematics in the Prize ceremony. Economics gets a nod though. Mathematics was then forced to hold farcical circus events every 4 years to present their priests with the laughable Fields medal. It gets worst still - the recipients must be under the age of 40. Apparently the human brain and its mathematical abstractness ceases to be when a person reaches the age of 480 months.
The dogmatic Mathematical circus scam has gone on long enough imo.