Quote:
Originally Posted by PRejto
Hi Aidan,
I agree with you. The worm might be a "hail Mary" pass. Maybe it will help. I'll say this here and not at SB but I think they really don't read the posts through in their entirety each day so, as you might imagine with the large number of issues, it is difficult to remember each thread from day to day. Even when I try to follow certain posts I find it difficult to manage all the facts from day to day and the evidence for that is in my last post over there to you. Yes, I know and you know what you have previously posted but my recommendation to you is that you post complete easily accessible info of exactly what you are trying to show with each post even if you area repeating yourself. And when a thread gets long and you have new info start a new thread and don't assume anything is remembered. This was my experience and it eventually bore fruit.
Peter
|
i agree that SB don't have the time to look at every post each time, sometimes i get other people entering the conversation meaning well but it puts the questions i had for SB further up the chain and they don't respond.
SB support has been ok, though i had a faulty MKS 5000, then the issue with tracking and now i am starting to get the tell tail signs of more hardware related issues (mount hit something and port in use errors). all my other gear has worked relatively flawlessly but i have not been overly impressed with the quality of SB.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Time will tell but I am pretty confident the new worm will fix things. Perhaps there is some play in the worm meshing with the gears or the axle of the worm is a bit off etc.
I guess we'll find out soon. PMX+ would still have belts right?
Greg.
|
we will find out soon ... i am also looking to move my telescope in the next few months so hopefully i will get improved seeing as well. i just might be able to produce some half decent images.