Quote:
Originally Posted by clive milne
With all due respect,
1. All input and results files of the ANSYS 16-story collapse initiation model with detailed connection models that were used to analyze the structural response to thermal loads, break element source code, ANSYS script files for the break elements, custom executable ANSYS file, and all Excel spreadsheets and other supporting calculations used to develop floor connection failure modes and capacities.
2. All input files with connection material properties and all results files of the LS-DYNA 47-story global collapse model that were used to simulate sequential structural failures leading to collapse, and all Excel spreadsheets and other supporting calculations used to develop floor connection failure modes and capacities.
...
fwiw) Here are 25 examples of egregious scientific fraud (by NIST)
http://www.ae911truth.org/images/art...10-19-14-3.pdf |
Take a look at the NIST response to these "examples of egregious scientific fraud":
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudi.../faqs_wtc7.cfm
As an example of why these conspiracy theory reports are just so much bunkum:
Point 4 of the 25 "examples" talks about how the NIST analysis shows large deformations, which cannot be seen in the video. The image of the computer analysis model shows the deformations amplified by about 100 times - the unmagnified deformations would be just about imperceptible. This is standard practice in computer structural analysis. If you want to know why, do a 4-year Structural Engineering degree, or talk to a Structural Engineer.