View Single Post
  #8  
Old 21-06-2016, 10:14 AM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by luka View Post
Russell, was your DSLR cooled? If not how long exposures did you do with it? Camera noise will become significant for exposures longer than few minutes.
the camera was uncooled, I have a fast imaging system 12" f4 newt, before the light pollution filter I was getting 70 second exposures. with the light pollution 3 mins was pretty much the sweet spot.

for narrow band it depended on the object, faint objects were overwhelmed with noise especially if it was warmer weather.

7 min subs on a bright object
https://www.flickr.com/photos/803366...posted-public/

10 min subs for bicolour helix
https://www.flickr.com/photos/803366...posted-public/

30 min helix raw trial sub - not recommended
https://www.flickr.com/photos/803366...posted-public/

here is another effort that I really didn't succeed digging out any faint detail because of the noise
https://www.flickr.com/photos/803366...posted-public/

so pretty much you're ok if its not hot and the object isn't too faint and you don't go over 10 mins as long as you get a fair bit of data. this of course isn't very scientific but just how I saw it. keep in mind the amount of Ha getting through on your chip will be way less so you will have more of a noise problem for me if you were considering Ha.
Reply With Quote