View Single Post
  #11  
Old 18-06-2016, 03:02 PM
GeoffMc (Geoff)
Registered User

GeoffMc is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 101
Hi Sheeny,

on the contrary, I've always held engineers in the highest regard, so your opinion is taken seriously.

What you say makes sense: a larger mass will dampen more quickly: as I understand it, the frequency drops inversely with increasing mass (f = sqrt (k/m)).

I suppose it depends on what is likely to happen in the dome when using the telescope. When I think about it, since this will be a teaching facility for one or two students at a time, the chance of knocking the pier while operating the telescope is pretty remote.

I'm leaning towards an empty pier at this stage, one that can be retrofilled if I can be convinced it's worth it.

Cheers,

Geoff Mc
Reply With Quote