Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU
Wow, excellent work.
|
Ta.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
Hi Peter,
yes - it looks even better now.
cheers
Allan
|
I guess so. I'm not the sort of imager who spends countless hours trying to fix problems in "post production". De-con is not my best friend
While I am amazed at the plethora of tools that can fix eggy/bloated/trailed and rainbow stars, and then some, I've found they often leave artifacts, hence don't use them. I'd rather re-shoot the data.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
The core detail is a fair bit sharper than my image I did last year and I thought mine was pretty sharp. So you are getting good value for money there. Like you said more data is needed. The back ground is pretty noisy and I am not a fan of the hard edge to your stars, but the overall potential with more data is for an outstanding image.
|
Ta Paul. More data can indeed do much
But I've found unless the seeing is around 2 arc sec or better I'm wasting my time at 3300 mm with this 'scope. I have yet to attach the reducer/corrector...while it doesn't improve the seeing...it might mask the effects a tad
