View Single Post
  #6  
Old 25-05-2016, 10:57 PM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyc View Post
Looks like something to do with settings on Autostakkert, and I don't think it's seeing. I've tried it a few times and quite often get similar results, in a way I don't typically get with Registax. I feel like I must be doing something wrong (many others use Autostakkert to great effect), but I'm not quite sure what...
Yes, this is my 1st of thoughts, the squarish artifacts size is very similar to the align box size I used - must be related in some way - could also be a bit of both, the wobbly seeing could be confusing the alignment box intensities, - I did raise the intensity value of the align boxes to bring/congregate them more to center of Mars but this didnt help if any - mmm, come to think, maybe need less intensity value as to cover the Limb further out - so to speak !

Ill must give this a few more goes, (tomoro - need early night) play with AutoStakkert settings further, only used it a few times to date ..
Cheers for all that Andy
,
,


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
What's funny is I get those artifacts more with registax when I use that to stack.
But the more frames the less likely it occurs
Yes same here Nik, so, to me, is why I suggest it could have an element of the 'seeing' effecting the quality, only guessing at this stage.
I captured 10,000 frames in this Run, did a stack of 5, 10, 20 & 40%'s and the squarish artifacts showed up in all and in all the same places ?
I should try some further Radical align box combinations
Reply With Quote