View Single Post
  #5  
Old 22-05-2016, 10:56 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegableguy View Post
Also - would have thought focal length was vastly more important for planets than aperture. They're plenty bright enough, they're just reeeeally small.
You need aperture to resolve detail because of the wave nature of light (web search "diffraction limit" for more info). For visual 6-8" is pretty good. For imaging approx 8" is a minimum and up to about 16" will yield more detail. At ~16" and above atmospheric blurring and other hassles with a large mirror win out.

Re getting more focal length: that's why God gave us the Barlow.
Reply With Quote