Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
This is a target I looked at a few nights ago as a new target selection. I think your lum looks good. Not sure about the colour data though. You could try blurring the colour data and then adding the lum to the blurred colour. A gaussian blur of around 3.2 should work well for you.
|
Captured some new colour data on Sunday, had a few goes at it this week but I think I am at about as good as its going to get. I was happy with my Red so I captured some more Green and Blue. Stars are nice and round this time around BUT the seeing towards the south was terrible, imaging from Melbourne with a 50% moon. Still not sure why but the G/B had FWHM of 3.8" while 10 minutes later I was getting FWHM of 2.4" in Ha to the East. Still not sure whether it was local seeing towards the south or HORRIBLE tracking. Had to blur the R channel from 2.5" to 3.8".
Quote:
Originally Posted by deeplook
Hi Colin,
seems to be some really nice Luminance data - I hope you can get good color data and make a beautiful colored image out of it!
Markus
|
Thanks Markus, waiting for the next new moon to head up to my dark site to recapture everything
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Nice work on the lum, Colin. It really is a very dim and tricky target.
|
I didn't think it was going to be overly difficult being Mag ~9.5 or something. Picked it because it was large
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed
nice work Col, L is looking really good. I would love to nab this target one day - apparently this is what the milky way would appear like from a distance, it might have to wait for a dark site (not that I've ever moved my gear) for me.
|
Thanks Russell. I would definitely wait for a dark site trip, the difference I have noticed from taking it at Heathcote with the moon around and down in Melbourne was staggering.