View Single Post
  #88  
Old 19-02-2016, 06:52 PM
Eratosthenes's Avatar
Eratosthenes (Peter)
Trivial High Priest

Eratosthenes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
for $140m it could have been in Aus. http://www.aigo.org.au/aigo_web_docs...iaProposal.pdf
Australia prefers to use almost 12 billion dollars EACH YEAR of Tax payers money to subsidise and help out the 83% foreign owned fossil fuel and mining industry which only employs about 3% of the Australian workforce and which doesnt pay very much tax.

Australia also prefers to have one of the worlds most lucrative negative gearing tax evasions schemes in the world, which costs the Australian tax pay many billions of dollars in tax revenue each year.

Australia also prefers to spend about 2.5 billion dollars per year detaining refugees in off shore detention centers - a cost which equates to almost $180,000 per refugee per year. All of these costs are met by the Australian tax payer and end up as profits for private individuals and corporations (most of which are foreign owned).

There is no way known that Australia could think big and fund such a project. No way Jose. India can, but there is absolutely no way Australia can - no way!!!

Reply With Quote