Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
The full res looks good ray. Nice colour overall, but maybe the galaxy looks just slightly magenta. The detail looks really good though and there are lots of different category galaxies in the field too. I think more data would bring out the dust lanes more in the galaxy arms and help reduce the ever so slight noise in the back ground. Your image has prompted me to place it on my ever growing list of targets to image with the RC. Well done.
|
thanks very much Paul - have posted an less magenta version.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos
Nicely captured Ray, quite a number of background galaxies when going surfing  Good resolution and detail in the galaxy too!
|
thank you Colin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Very cool Ray. Superb colors and details as usual. Lots of interesting little background galaxies with some structure as well. 
|
Thank very much Marc. appreciated
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Dots?... DOTS???  where?...I don't see any dots
Excellent image, lovely overall look very natural but highly detailed. If I can't see dots or worms then...  ..you have clearly mastered the use of decon/wavelets application Ray  This image clearly shows that a $70K RC/CDK or any large long focal length scope for that matter really, or 30+hr exposures, are just simply not needed to produce World Class galaxy images
Ok, here's another one of these:
Mike
Who still wants a long FL CDK 
|
Thanks very much Mike - phew, no dots!!. A big scope sure would be better, but thankfully it is not totally essential in Australian seeing - mind you, better seeing would be nice as well

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35
Excellent image Ray! Wish I'd taken it.
Cheers
Steve
|
very generous - thanks Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
I'm a big fan of your images also Ray.
I really like this image as well. Beautiful stars too.
Greg.
|
Hi Greg - thanks very much.
regards Ray