View Single Post
  #30  
Old 15-11-2015, 08:21 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Looks like the QE might be significantly better than a KAI-11K, Greg, though not as good as the Sony sensors.

Cheers,
Rick.
Perhaps not significantly 51% to around 58% at peak but perhaps the curve is better on the 16200. The main gain seems to be the lower read noise. Nowhere near the Sony's though but then the Sony's all have tiny well depths. Nothing's perfect eh? The 16803 though is a pretty good all rounder.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
Hi Greg, did you mean QHY?

If Atik was making a camera with this sensor, I would be very tempted. But need to save for a more refined mount first...

Oh yes sorry that's right. Its QHY. Are they up to making a high quality CCD?

Greg.
Reply With Quote