Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Although not quuuite the barrage seen of NGC 253 images  NGC 300 is still a popular target, so it has to look really good or a bit different to elicit more than "nice image" or just "nice"  ...in this case it is both really good and different, so...umm?...nice image!
Mike
|
Thanks, Mike. I think I'm working out that for a well-imaged object, "nice" might mean a gold star and a koala stamp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
Hi Mike and Trish,
what an amazing image - NGC 300 in Ha.
I've never seen that before &
1 hour subs binned 2x2 !!!
You are giving me ideas.
cheers
Allan
|
Thanks, Allan. For really faint stuff, a dark site, ultra-long subs, and 2x2 binning are the way to go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT
Well that was interesting, MnT. Introduced Bias!
I looked at the Ha first then at the LRgb combined with the Ha data and you are immediately aware of the structures of those star forming regions in the very fine LHaRGB image.
Usually when I look at an Galaxy image with added Ha, I don't pick up on just what an impact it has to the overall image. So I'll be paying more attention in the future.
great idea to show both images. 
|
Cheers, David. Glad you like it and had fun comparing.
Best,
Mike