|
In all probability in principle I am uncertain but we chose to except the benefits that models give us in terms of usable goodies.
Things just are, objects people institutions even religions we often make the choice in our observation to also attempt to qualify what we personally observe and as humans we will say something is good or bad, it is right or wrong so as to fit our observation conveniently and acceptably into our personal reality and in that attempt we lose sight and recognition that our personal attempt at qualification is useful in any way other than allowing us to accept or reject a greater external reality of which we can only remain ignorant about nevertheless we are personally satisfied our personal observation and personal qualification is a reliable and somewhat concrete reality which of corset it can not be and so to observe and qualify anything is somewhat isles because all we are then working with is only an assembly of determinations from an unrecognised assembly of probabilities that moreover we have not considered in the attempt to truthfully qualify from observation and of course we can only do this from a human perspective wherein we invariably fail to take into account the limits being human places upon reasonable observation must limited by matters we fail to consider unless perhaps pointed put after our attempt such as our limitation on regions that are observable to us without additional equipment and here the electromagnetic spectrum comes to mind and our limited ability to observe it to it's full extent but if we recognise the limitations of our ability to qualify reality we are struck with a possibility that probability and the accompanying alternative realities perhaps provide a closer look at what may be reality and of course more importantly what may not be reality.
Does that mean we can include what we chose to include in our personal reality by tossing a coin to surname the inclusion or exclusion
|