Quote:
Originally Posted by Eratosthenes
Statistics isn't exactly my area (either professionally or hobby wise)
The non deterministic stochastic illusion, whilst useful in some areas of science, sociology and mathematics, does however underpin much of the deranged lunacy of Quantum Mechanics.
|
It's ironic the microprocessor design of your computer is the technological outcome of the deranged lunacy of Quantum Electrodynamics that allows you to type and transmit ill informed comments.
Quote:
|
I believe I have made my views on the pathetic and synthetic basis of QM abundantly clear in this forum. The discipline of Physics should be utterly ashamed of itself for trying to hoodwink the general public and for fraudulantly fabricating its under graduate Physics programs in Universities all around the world.
|
What's abundantly clear is that you don't know what your "talking" about.
In this very
thread you initiated, the LHC, the particle detector designs and the experiment itself are all based on Quantum Mechanics.
Strange how such a "pathetic" and "synthetic" theory can lead to the production of particles and antiparticles.
Here is a question for you. The resolution of detail in a microscope depends on the wavelength of light used. The shorter the wavelength the greater the detail.
Microscopes using soft x-rays resolve more detail than visible light. Yet this relationship fails for even shorter wavelengths in the hard x-ray and gamma-ray range.
Why is this so?
Here is a hint, the answer lies in the probabilistic nature of Quantum mechanics as one goes to increasingly high energy photons.