View Single Post
  #6  
Old 11-09-2015, 01:20 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avoman1 View Post
still unsure of the optical quality difference between the two brands.
Skywatcher has a reputation for producing consistently good optics in it's higher end models. That reputation is supported by a number of interferometric tests over at astro-foren, including a few samples of the ED120.

WO has a checkered history having released some very poor Fluorostars in the past, particularly around 2008-09. Reports of more recent Fluorostars are much more favourable. I recently bought a dodgy flt132 and WO have been kind enough to upgrade me to a new objective for a modest fee; it's out of stock atm, though I'll probably have it in a few weeks and can report on its quality first hand then.

My impression is that there's little difference in the optical quality of recent scopes released by these two brands.
Reply With Quote